Introduction

The Risk Management Plan is designed to identify, assess, and manage risks that could potentially impact the successful delivery of products defined in this PMP. This plan outlines the processes and strategies to mitigate risks, ensuring that the project stays on track, within budget, and meets quality standards.

Objectives

The primary objectives of this Risk Management Plan are:

  • Identify Risks: Systematically identify potential risks that could affect project milestones.
  • Assess Risks: Evaluate the likelihood and impact of identified risks.
  • Mitigate Risks: Develop strategies to minimize the impact of risks on the project.
  • Monitor Risks: Continuously monitor and review risks throughout the project lifecycle.
  • Communicate Risks: Ensure that all stakeholders are informed about risks and the measures being taken to manage them.

Risk Management Process

Risk Identification

Risk identification involves the systematic recognition of potential threats that could impede project success. By conducting collaborative brainstorming sessions with project team members and stakeholders, reviewing past project lessons, and categorizing risks into different types such as technical, operational, financial, and external risks, the aim is to proactively document and analyze risks that could affect the project's scope, schedule, budget, quality, or resources. This process may also include employing risk assessment tools and techniques, evaluating risks based on severity and likelihood, and continuously monitoring and updating the risk profile throughout the project lifecycle to ensure timely mitigation and proactive risk management.

Risk Assessment

The team will evaluate the identified risks to determine their potential impact on project objectives and develop strategies to mitigate or manage them effectively. This process includes assessing each risk based on factors such as severity, likelihood of occurrence, and potential consequences. Risks are prioritized according to their criticality and urgency, allowing the project team to focus on addressing high-risk areas first. When the team determines a risk assessment is necessary for the project, it can be used to help make informed decisions, allocate resources efficiently, and implement proactive measures to minimize the impact of potential risks. Regular monitoring and reassessment of risks ensure that mitigation strategies remain relevant and effective throughout the project lifecycle.

Risk Mitigation Planning

The team will analyze and strategize responses to identified risks to minimize their impact on the project. This process entails developing contingency plans and proactive actions to address potential threats efficiently. By outlining specific measures, responsibilities, and timelines to mitigate high-priority risks, project teams can enhance project resilience and reduce the likelihood of risks materializing. Strategies may include risk avoidance, risk transfer, risk reduction, or risk acceptance, tailored to the nature and severity of each risk. Through regular monitoring and adjustment of mitigation strategies, software development teams can effectively manage uncertainties and increase the project's chances of successful completion within scope, timeline, and budget.

Risk Monitoring and Control

During this phase the team will be continuously overseeing identified risks, implementing mitigation strategies, and tracking their effectiveness throughout the project lifecycle. This process includes regular evaluation of risk triggers, gauging the progress of mitigation actions, and assessing any new risks that may emerge. By maintaining a proactive stance on risk management, the team can promptly address issues, adjust mitigation plans as needed, and prevent potential risks from escalating. Effective risk monitoring and control foster project resilience, enabling the team to stay on track, make informed decisions, and ensure successful software development outcomes within the defined parameters of scope, schedule, and budget.

Risk Communication

Effective risk communication is crucial for ensuring transparency, fostering collaboration, and facilitating informed decision-making. This phase involves creating clear channels for sharing risk information, updates, and mitigation strategies with team members, project sponsors, and other relevant parties. By establishing open lines of communication, project teams can promote a shared understanding of potential risks, their implications, and the actions being taken to address them. Timely and transparent risk communication enhances risk awareness, encourages proactive risk management, and enables stakeholders to align their expectations and responses to potential challenges. Incorporating risk communication strategies into the project plan helps build trust, mitigate misunderstandings, and enhance overall project resilience in software development endeavors.

Monitoring and Reporting

To ensure proactive risk management, schedule routine risk review meetings to evaluate the current status of identified risks and make necessary adjustments to mitigation strategies. Keep stakeholders informed through regular risk reporting updates on the status of risks and the efficacy of mitigation actions. Embrace a culture of continuous improvement by leveraging insights from risk management activities to enhance processes and diminish potential risks in the future.

Conclusion

The Risk Management Plan is a critical component of the project management process, ensuring that potential risks are identified, assessed, and managed effectively. By following this plan, the project team can minimize the impact of risks on the project, ensuring successful delivery within scope, on time, and within budget.

Risk factors with accompanied mitigation plan are identified in the table below. If any of these risk factors affect schedule and milestone completion, these impacts will be reported to the CURG and AG during quarterly calls and adjustments will be made to the PMP.


Risk Factors

Risk

Risk Category

Risk Probability

Risk Impact

Mitigation Plan

Schedule slippage caused by unexpected/unintended software interactions between the various elements that make up the CWMS Software suite. CWMS is a framework that ties together several different modeling applications, allowing one model's results to be ingested as the next model's input. Maintaining clean API interfaces between the various models is paramount to maintaining schedules for this investment.

Schedule

Medium

Medium

Developer meetings are scheduled regularly to surface and address any issues that are identified as issues between the various models. When identified, developers are asked to address and correct changed API elements used to exchange data between models.

Success of the investment requires sufficient resources to address field issues in a timely fashion as well as to maintain the code base to current Army standards.

Project resources

Medium

Medium

The development team is constantly balancing their response to immediate issues identified by the field users as well as the ever changing standards imposed by changing technical requirements.

Reductions in Federal Budgets are ever reducing the ability for the agency to provide sufficient funds to provide adequate field support to users.

Life-cycle costs

Medium

Medium

Should support fall below baseline requirements in any one year, then reduced response time to field issues will result and changes needed to maintain technical standards will need to be carefully prioritized in the order of minimizing other system risks, e.g., to system security and function.

Schedule slippage caused by delays in contract awards. Currently HEC has a SATOC with one firm that has extensive knowledge of CWMS and HEC software code and the engineering background of how the code needs to be utilized. The SATOC is good through September 2027. It is anticipated that there will be a new SATOC and also a MATOC that will provide the resourcing necessary for CWMS development beyond 2027. If for some reason a new SATOC and MATOC is not awarded this could affect development in future FY's as each contract will need to be sole sourced and this can add time for advertisement and evaluation of other companies and delay the CWMS schedule.

Schedule

Medium

Medium

Regularly meet with contracting office to track the status of the contracts. Work on developing a new IDIQ SATOC to support sole-source procurements and MATOC to engage other contractors. Alert CECI when potential for delay in schedule.

Uncertainty and evolving requirements regarding G6 provided services and IT related policies.

Project resources

Medium

Medium

Close coordination with G6 and CECI.