In the SSP_Examples.ssp study, the input data for the Bulletin 17 analysis, FFA Test 2, is the same as that for Example 2 in Appendix 12, Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency, Water Resources Council (WRC) Bulletin 17B.  FFA Test 2 illustrates the application to data with a high outlier.

This example uses Bulletin 17B procedures (Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1982).  Current Federal flood frequency guidance directs analysts to use Bulletin 17C procedures (England, et al., 2019).  Bulletin 17C examples can be found here.

The data for this example is from Floyd River in James, Iowa. The period of record used is from 1935 to 1973. To view the data from HEC-SSP, right-click on the data record labeled "Floyd River-James IA" in the study explorer and then select Tabulate. The data will appear as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Tabulation of the Peak Flow Data for the Floyd River

To plot the data for this example, right-click on the data record and then select Plot. A plot of the data will appear as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Plot of Floyd River Data

A Bulletin 17 and General Frequency analysis have been developed for this example. To open the Bulletin 17 analysis editor for FFA Test 2, double-click on the analysis labeled FFA Test 2 from the HEC-SSP main window, from the Study Pane. Alternatively, from the Analysis menu select Open and then select FFA Test 2 from the list of available analyses in the Open Analysis dialog box. When FFA Test 2 is opened, the Bulletin 17 Editor will appear as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Bulletin 17 Analysis Editor with FFA Test 2 Data Set

Shown in Figure 3 are the general settings that were used to perform this frequency analysis. As shown, the Skew option was set to use the Weighted Skew. To use the weighted skew option, the user must enter a value for the Regional Skew and the Regional Skew MSE. This selection requires the user to either look up a value from the generalized skew map of the United States, which is provided with Bulletin 17B (Plate 1), or develop a value from a regional analysis of nearby gages. In this example a value of -0.3 was taken from the generalized skew map of the U.S. from Bulletin 17B. Bulletin 17B suggests using a Regional Skew MSE of 0.302 whenever regional skew values are taken from the map.

The recommended procedure for estimating regional skew in Bulletin 17C is the Bayesian generalized least squares (B-GLS) method. Regional skew studies are available for many states through the Advisory Committee on Water Information, Subcommittee on Hydrology, Hydrologic Frequency Analysis Working Group website. Regional skew values presented in these reports supersede the values from the Bulletin 17B generalized skew map.

Also for this example, the Expected Probability Curve option was selected to be computed in addition to the Log Pearson III computed curve. The Median plotting position method was selected, as well as the default Confidence Limits.

Shown in Figure 4 is the Bulletin 17 editor with the Options tab selected.  As shown in Figure 4, the Historic Period Data option has been selected to reflect the fact that the 1953 flood peak of 71,500 cfs is known to be the largest flood since 1892. When the analysis was originally performed on this data set, the 1953 event was found to be a high outlier.

The reader may replicate this result by un-checking the "Use Historic Data" box, hitting the Compute button, and reviewing the Tabular Results tab.  High outliers should not be eliminated from an analysis, as they are valuable pieces of the flow record. However, when a high outlier is found in a data set, it suggests that the event might actually be the largest in a much longer period of record.  The user should always try to locate and incorporate historic information to define a longer record and improve the quality of the frequency analysis. 

Since it was known that the 1953 event was the largest value since 1892, the year 1892 is entered as the Start Year for the historic period. Additionally, an Override High Threshold Value of 70,000 cfs was entered. By entering the High Threshold Value of 70,000 cfs, the 1953 flood of 71,500 cfs was removed from the systematic record and treated as a historic data value during the historic data adjustment calculations performed by HEC-SSP and outlined in Bulletin 17B, Appendix 6. Since no End Year was entered for the historic period, the last year of the systematic data set will be used as the End Year.  Other features on this tab include the Low Outlier Threshold and the option to override the default Frequency Ordinates, neither of which are selected in this example.

Figure 4. Bulletin 17 Editor with Options Tab Selected for FFA Test 2

Once all of the General and Optional settings are set or selected, the user can press the Compute button to perform the analysis. Once the computations have been completed, a message window will open stating Compute Complete. Close this window and then select the Tabular Results tab. The analysis window should resemble Figure 5.

Figure 5. Bulletin 17 Editor with Results Tab Selected for FFA Test 2

As shown in Figure 5, the Frequency Curve table contains the following results:

  • Percent Chance Exceedance
  • Computed Curve
  • Expected Probability Curve
  • Confidence Limits

On the bottom left-hand side of the Tabular Results tab is the Distribution Parameters (statistics) table displaying the observed station data (mean, standard deviation, station skew) and regional adjustment (regional skew, weighted skew, and adopted skew). Also on the bottom right-hand side of the Tabular Results tab is the number of Events table showing the number of historic events used in the analysis, number of high outliers found, number of low outliers, number of zero or missing data years, number of systematic events in the gage record, and the historic record length (if historic data was entered).

In addition to the tabular results, a graphical plot of the computed frequency curves can be obtained by pressing the Plot Curve button (Figure 5) at the bottom of the Bulletin 17 Editor. A plot of the results for this example is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Plotted Frequency Curves for FFA Test 2

In addition to the tabular and graphical results, there is a report file that shows the order in which the calculations were performed. To review the report file, press the View Report button at the bottom of the Bulletin 17 Editor (Figure 5). The View Report button opens a text viewer window displaying the report file (e.g., FFA_Test_2.rpt). Shown in Figure 7 is the report file for FFA Test 2.  The report file contains a listing of the input data, preliminary results, outlier and historical data tests, additional calculations needed, and the final frequency curve results. Different types and amounts of information will show up in the report file depending on the data and the options that have been selected for the analysis. The user should review the report file to understand how HEC-SSP performed the frequency curve calculations.

Figure 7. FFA Test 2 Report File