Task 2: Real-Time Operations with HEC-ResSim
Review the Results
First add the Future Rain forecast run to the forecast tree.
Compute the Future Rain forecast alternative.
Display it in the map panel or place a checkmark in its box in the forecast run tree.
To add a forecast run to your forecast, select Run Selector from the Forecast menu. Model Linking for the Future Rain scenario may need to be reviewed.
To display a forecast run in the map panel, right click on the run in the forecast run tree and select Display in Map.
- Before Water Managers begin determining reservoir releases, inflows to the reservoirs should be first evaluated through the inspection of the HMS results. In the Map Display, zoom in to the northern portion of the basin and find the HEC-HMS junctions that receive the Lake Mendocino, Ukiah Loc, and Hopland Loc subbasin flows. View results (graphs) at these three junctions.
- How well calibrated is the HEC-HMS model for this event?
At Coyote Lake Inflow?
Very good. Good timing and good shape, computed peaks are a bit higher than observed. Nash-Sutcliffe 0.953 and Percent Bias -5.38%.
At Ukiah Gage?
Ukiah's simulated peaks in the hydrographs match well with the observed flows for timing. At Percent Bias of 1.03% and Nash-Sutcliffe of 0.897 it is well calibrated.
At Hopland Gage?
Computed volume is less than the observed, although the peak and general shape of the hydrograph match well with observed. While the Nash-Sutcliffe value is good at 0.890 the Percent Bias of -24.60% indicates additional calibration is needed.
- Check the box in front of each forecast run. This will cause the HEC-ResSim plots and summary reports to include results for all checked alternatives (if there were more than one).
Where was the Coyote pool at time-of-forecast? Is this the same for both Forecast Runs?
744.13 ft, encroached in the flood pool. This was the same for both the Future Rain and No Future Rain Forecasts.
What was the Coyote pool elevation at the end of the forecast for each forecast run?
Both forecasts returned to guide curve elevation of 737.5 ft. The No Future Rain Forecast on Jan 12 and the Future Rain Forecast on Jan 15
What was the highest elevation the Coyote pool reached for each forecast?
745.29 ft for the No Future Rain Forecast, and 750.32 ft for the Future Rain Forecast.
What output option(s) did you use to obtain these elevations?
Release Decision report and Reservoir Summary report.
How did the release differ between the two Forecasts?
While both forecasts released a maximum of 4,000 cfs, the timing of the releases varied. The No Future Rain forecast was able to begin ramping releases to 4,000 cfs on Jan 10th, and then reduced on Jan 12th. The Future Rain forecast kept the gates closed for a longer period, and did not begin ramping up to 4,000 cfs until late on Jan 11th. Releases were maintained until Jan 15th.
Problem 1 - Debris Dam
You just got a call from the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) informing you that a debris dam has built up in the river at a major highway bridge near Hopland. They want to start debris removal as soon as possible, but need the flood wave to recede below 3,000 cfs at the Hopland gage. They estimate they need the region as "dewatered as possible" for at least 48 hours. Assume that no rain is forecasted for the next 3 to 4 days.
Operation Support Interface Overrides
Use the Operation Support Interface (OSI) to develop a release schedule to meet the EOC's request for the Hopland bridge. The OSI is a feature in ResSim that allows users to create a customized editor for developing a release schedule (perform overrides). A configured OSI has been provided for you.
- Click on the HEC-ResSim alternative (RT-Normal) under the No Future Rain forecast run in the Forecasts tree.
- From the Actions tab, select Operation Support…
- Select the Reservoir Outflows tab in the OSI and click in the Mendocino Outflow column. Study the current situation. Then, specify a release schedule for Coyote Dam (Mendocino Outflow) to meet the EOC's 48hr dewatering request for Hopland.
How did you accomplish this task?
The flows at Hopland were not due to recede below 3,000 cfs until after 1300 on January 12th. Set the releases from Coyote Dam (Mendocino Outflow) to maintain the 25 cfs release from 1300 on 9 Jan thru 2300 on 11 Jan. The resulting flows at Hopland exceed 3,000 again around 0500 on 12 Jan. This operation provides the Emergency Operations Center the 48 hours needed to clear the debris dam.
Great job! You saved the bridge at Hopland!!!
Problem 2 - Deviation for Dam Safety Concerns
At 0600 on 09 Jan you just got a call from the dam safety inspectors who are visiting Coyote Dam. The wet period that Lake Mendocino has been experiencing this year after a long drought has stressed the dam structure. Leakage has increased significantly to the point that the dam safety inspectors have requested Coyote Lake's winter pool be drawn down an additional 10 feet, and that the dam be regulated to keep the pool below 745 feet. They also want operations revised to empty stored flood waters as quickly as possible.
You must make the necessary adjustment to the reservoir's operations, revise the alternative, and verify that your changes meet the requirements.
NOTE – this is a different scenario than Problem 1 so you need to clear out the overrides from the previous problem.
To clear your previous overrides:
- Open the OSI.
- Click in the Mendocino Outflow column.
- Click the Clear All action button to the right of the data entry table. Clear All will "delete" the overrides and force a re-compute for the active forecast run.
- Right-click the Future Rain forecast run and select Display in Map to display it in the existing map window.
- Right-click on Coyote reservoir in the map and select Edit Properties. (Make sure to select Edit Properties from the Reservoir Menu). This will open the HEC-ResSim Reservoir Editor>RT-Normal-Coyote.
- Click on the Operations tab.
- Make a copy of the Normal Operations operation set and call it Deviation. To do so, select Duplicate… from the Operations menu.
- Adjust the guide curve in your new operation set to meet the requirements described above.
What changes did you make to the guide curve?
Adjusted the Conservation Zone:
Set conservation pool to 727.5 instead of 737.5 year round (i.e. no summer pool).
Since this is a dam safety issue, protecting the integrity of the dam takes precedence over the need for summer pool.
Are there any other changes you should make to the operation set to reflect the deviation operations called for by the inspectors? What are they?
Set Flood Pool (Flood Control Zone) to 743.0 (want to give a buffer to the dam safety threshold)
Change Max Release-FC Schedule rule by lowering all of the elevation thresholds by 10 feet (proportional to lowering conservation pool by 10 feet) - Note that changing this rule in one zone will automatically update the rule in other zones where it is used.
Other modifications could include:
Remove the rate of change constraints (IF-Block).
Change the Emergency Release Schedule rule by lowering all of the elevation thresholds by 10 feet to match lowering Conservation Pool and Max Release by 10 feet.
- If you identified other changes, make them, then click OK to apply your changes and close the reservoir editor.
- Click on the RT-Normal ResSim alternative under the Future Rain forecast run in the forecast run tree. Then, click on the Edit Alternatives button in the Actions tab below.
- Click on the Operations Tab in the Alternative Editor, and change the Operation Set for Coyote Reservoir to Deviation and click Save.
- Compute the forecast and review the results.
Did your changes meet the objective?
Yes, the operations now keep the pool below 745'.
How did your changes affect the Coyote reservoir releases for this forecast run?
For the first 4 hours of the forecast period the reservoir is within the updated Flood Control zone and is reducing releases to 25 cfs to meet downstream control rules. On the 10th through mid day on the 11th, releases increase up to 7,000 cfs in order to to avoiding going into the updated Emergency zone but also not releasing so much to drop into the Flood Control zone and completely ignore downstream control rules. Early on the 12th, the downstream local flows fall enough so that the reservoir can open more to meet downstream control rules and evacuate flood control storage. Releases are increased to 4,000 cfs. The reservoir reaches the updated guide curve just before the end of the simulation window on 16 Jan.
Additional notes:
- If you ever find yourself in one of these scenarios, make sure to extend the forecast window out far enough to see when the reservoir could get back to guide curve or any updated version of guide curve (this will be the very next question dam safety will ask).
- Also, this is great example of why adding QPF to a CWMS forecast provides invaluable information for dam safety planning (or any planning at the dam by project staff). While the QPF is only a forecast, it helps inform the what-if scenario and help the project staff understand when they may reach certain lake elevations. Can also help address questions such as when can the project reopen the beach or campground..
- Having CWMS ensemble forecasting can help convey the future risk and help formulate what interim deviation plan would be appropriate (versus a deterministic forecast as you had in this exercise).
Great job, you saved the dam!!!
Prior Task(s):
Current Task:
Next Task(s):